Building Cyber Resilience Website 2

Building Cyber Resilience: A Robust Roadmap for the Future

An informative new paper issued by two CLA Global member firms outlines the imperative challenge of addressing cybersecurity risks for modern businesses in today’s climate. 

Emphasizing that both small enterprises and large corporations face severe operational and legal consequences from data breaches, CLA Global TS and CLA Indus Value Consulting offer insight into the most prevalent modern cybersecurity threats. Exploring the impact of ransomware, phishing and insider risks, the report also offers a comprehensive list of preventative best practices.

Previously relegated as an issue for the IT department to resolve, the extensive reach of cyber risks and the complexity of the global digital environment means that cybersecurity now sits at the top table of executive strategies and discussions. 

The World Economic Forum's Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 confirms that cybersecurity fraud is currently the most pervasive threat facing organizations worldwide. This issue has become a top concern for CEOs, underscoring the need for collective action across industries and sectors. Leaders recognize that addressing these risks requires collaboration and coordinated strategies to protect their enterprises and stakeholders from evolving cyber threats.

The ramifications of a cybersecurity breach extend well beyond initial financial impacts. Organizations may experience lengthy interruptions to their operations, facing difficulties in restoring business functions and maintaining productivity. 

“Strong cybersecurity is not just about preventing incidents - it is about building resilience, enabling confidence in digital operations, and sustaining trust with customers, partners, and investors in an increasingly connected world,” explains co-author of the Protect Your Organization report, Pamela Chen, Director, Head of Risk Advisory, Data Governance at CLA Global TS. 

These consequences highlight the necessity for proactive cybersecurity measures, ensuring that companies of every size are prepared to manage and mitigate the risks posed by evolving digital threat.

The SME Security Paradox

One of the most prevalent misconceptions is that SMEs are invisible to attackers. Realistically, being smaller is not a security shield, it can in fact be a vulnerability. Although the stakes are higher in larger corporations due to sheer data volumes, companies with less mature controls often make them easier targets for automated cyberattacks, suggests the report. 

“The consequences of a single security breach carry greater weight financially and reputationally in big companies, yet in SMEs an attack could result in total closure of the business,” expands Pamela. 

There are however numerous practical and affordable steps that SMEs can take to bridge this security gap. 

Has Singapore’s cyber taskforce mastered it?

Singapore is testament to the benefits of having an aligned and resilient regulatory digital security framework. Designed to enforce security and accountability, alongside a defined ‘48-hour containment’ response plan, the ecosystem comprises several key pillars anchored in key local and global regulations. 

The speed of a coordinated response is integral to the future of any organization. According to Singapore’s Cyber Fraud Handling Process, the ultimate impact of a cyberattack is determined in the first 24 to 48 hours. Although there are six steps, the containment phase is the most critical. It involves isolating the incident, alerting internal teams, securing evidence and appointing an external cybersecurity professional.

The second step is when the authorities are notified. At this phase incidents must be reported to the:

•   Singapore Police Force (SPF) for criminal reporting.
•   Cyber Security Agency (CSA) for national-level threat monitoring.
•   Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions governed by TRM guidelines.

This is followed by an internal investigation, seeking legal counsel, restoring systems and concludes with a formal review. Throughout, a strong communication strategy should run concurrently to manage the internal and external reputational risks. 

“As cybercriminals adopt more sophisticated and targeted approaches, immediate coordination using a tested plan could mean the difference between containment or potential catastrophe,” confirms Vikas Kumta, Director, Cyber Security at CLA Indus Value Consulting.

Identifying the top risks

Today’s threat landscape is increasingly being defined by AI-driven fraud, notes the report. Modern cybercriminals are utilizing deepfakes to launch highly sophisticated, targeted attacks that exploit the most basic element of any business - human trust. 

“We have reached a point where video and voice are no longer absolute proof of identity,” comments Vikas. 

Given that these approaches are so targeted, independent verification via secure, pre-established channels is now a non-negotiable protocol. If an unusual request for a financial transaction arrives, even if it appears to come from a C-suite executive via a video call, it should always be verified through a separate, trusted and authorized communication channel.

Other key recommendations shared by the CLA Global member firm risk professionals include enforcing multi factor authentication, keeping systems patched and updated, encrypting data at rest and in transit, and protecting endpoints and networks through segmentation and advanced detection tools. 

Fostering a culture of vigilance

Even with the most advanced technical controls, human error remains the most primary risk factor. Yet, one of the biggest takeaways from the report is how important workforces are to creating a vigilant, security-first culture. 

Awareness is critical. The top three actions organizations are advised to take include:

1.    Train staff on the hallmarks to look for in phishing messages.
2.    Establishing strict protocols to verify caller identities before sharing sensitive information.
3.    Educating staff on deepfake risks.

Cybersecurity risks are accelerating at unprecedented speed, with AI-related vulnerabilities rising faster than any other category. Robust governance and long term resilience requires organizations to think beyond their own operations as well. This requires undertaking regular risk analysis, including Third Party Risk Management (TPRM).

“Your cybersecurity is only as strong as your weakest link. This means the review of your digital supply chain must also extend beyond the firewalls of your organization to every vendor and entity in your data and digital chain,” concludes Kartik Radia, CEO at CLA Indus Value Consulting.  

Click here to download the full report. For more information on how to keep your business safe, secure and compliant from all cybersecurity risks, please contact the CLA Global member firm professionals: 

For further information

Pamela Chen
Director, Head of Risk, Advisory Data Governance, Sustainability & Climate Change at CLA Global TS
https://www.linkedin.com/in/pamela-chen-a279a2238/ 

Maria Teo
Director, Risk Advisory, Data Governance, Sustainability & Climate Change at CLA Global TS
https://www.linkedin.com/in/maria-t-8093781b4/ 

Kartik Radia
CEO at CLA Indus Value Consulting
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kartik-radia-a648096/ 

Vikas Kumta
Director, Cyber Security at CLA Indus Value Consulting
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vikaskumta/ 

Xavier Sahaya
CISO at CLA Indus Value Consulting

The information contained herein is for general informational purposes only and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, auditing, accounting, investment, or tax advice or opinion provided by CLA Global or any of its individual member firms to the reader. No client, advisory, fiduciary, or other professional relationship is established or implied between the reader and CLA Global or any of its member firms through the presentation of the information contained herein. The reader is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of a number of other factors if any action is to be contemplated. Accordingly, the information presented herein should not be considered a substitute for the reader’s independent investigation and sound technical business judgment, and the reader is advised to contact his or her CLA Global member firm or other tax or professional advisor prior to taking any action based upon said information. Neither CLA Global nor any of its member firms assume any obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.